Interesting take on the All-tournament teams. Did your team have to play 4-5 games and play in the championship game to be considered? Or be from the North Division, Grand Rapids in particular? (Tongue firmly in cheek!)
Seems curious that, out of 16 TOTAL teams, ALL the best INDIVIDUAL players were only on a couple teams in the eyes of the "voters". (Or whoever?) Not one other guy, save for a couple 2nd teamers, made the cut, regardless of statistical leadership and the proven ability to lead THEIR team to victories and/or very competitive performances.
Well,..... I suppose the old sports adage applies that you more than likely have to play FOR a winner to be recognized as one. Still a bit one-sidedly curious.